I’ve mentioned before that I am a horrible pack rat. I’ve also reported that I have a collection of autographed hock pucks. I used to spend quite a bit of time on E-bay. It was like getting a present in the mail. I don’t use E-bay much anymore, but I do like to order things from Amazon.com. And I also have a collection of books — some just waiting to be read.
When I got home from another 13-hour work day this evening, I noticed that Amazon.com had sent me a present (that I had given to myself). I had ordered a book called Vintage Humor for Wine Lovers by Malcolm Kushner. It’s a collection of funny stories, quotes, jokes and poems that relate in some form or fashion to wine.
On twitter yesterday I posited that the “hotness” of a wine maker, or someone pouring wine could affect the perception of the wine by the taster. I argued that it was possible that the neophyte would enjoy a wine more when poured by an attractive person. And likewise, someone who considered himself a connoisseur, might judge a wine more harshly if poured by a pretty young girl. Other wine twitter’s responded that it would have no effect, mainly because most people have no idea what the wine maker looks like.
In my newly-arrived book is a little story about perception. It’s entitled “A Wine to Dye For.”
Red is the Color of my True Love’s Wine
On April 11, 2002, Internet news source Ananova reported that a group of 54 tasters in Bordeaux heaped praises on a red wine in an expensive bottle. There was just one problem. It was really a cheap white wine.
Psychologists conducting an experiment, added tasteless food dye to a cheap white wine and placed the mixture in an expensive-looking bottle. None of the “experts” detected the deception.
When tasted from the expensive bottle, the wine was called ‘robust,’ ‘fruity but charming,’ and ‘marvelous.’ When drunk from the proper bottle, it was called ‘weak,’ ‘thin,’ and ‘too tight.’
The tasters are still seeing red. But it has nothing to do with wine. – from Vintage Humor for Wine Lovers.”
Now while the attractiveness of the wine maker or the person pouring the wine might not, on its own, make one more inclined to give the wine a positive review, I think it might cause the taster to want to rate the wine more highly. Or for someone who prides himself on being completely unbiased towards a wine from a good-looking wine maker, that he might want to judge a wine more harshly when poured by a young, attractive pourer with very little wine knowledge to impart.
And while it certainly doesn’t seem “fair” to wineries and wine makers, the marketing and advertising people they contracted know this to be true. therefore, it’s the job of the marketer or advertiser to help convince his client that there are always factors in the selling of the wine that have nothing to do with the wine itself.