<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wine Spectator, Scammers or Scammed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anotherwineblog.com/archives/390/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anotherwineblog.com/archives/390</link>
	<description>Because another wine food and travel  blog was way too long.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:59:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Booze Blog Roundup &#124; DrinkPlanner</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherwineblog.com/archives/390/comment-page-1#comment-870</link>
		<dc:creator>Booze Blog Roundup &#124; DrinkPlanner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherwineblog.com/?p=390#comment-870</guid>
		<description>[...] Another Wine Blog takes a look at the recent Wine Spectator dust-up [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another Wine Blog takes a look at the recent Wine Spectator dust-up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wineblogcentral.com</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherwineblog.com/archives/390/comment-page-1#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>wineblogcentral.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherwineblog.com/?p=390#comment-867</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wine Spectator Scammers or Scammed? &#124; another wine blog...&lt;/strong&gt;

Apparently Wine Spectator is pay to play! You pay the fee they recommend you. I had heard this before but now there is proof........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wine Spectator Scammers or Scammed? | another wine blog&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Apparently Wine Spectator is pay to play! You pay the fee they recommend you. I had heard this before but now there is proof&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Houstonwino</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherwineblog.com/archives/390/comment-page-1#comment-3449</link>
		<dc:creator>Houstonwino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherwineblog.com/?p=390#comment-3449</guid>
		<description>Hi Thomas,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to comment...and you&#039;re welcome. Everyone wants to take down the big guy, and if Wine Spectator isn&#039;t the biggest guy on the block, it is certainly close. One of the best ways for a blog to get noticed and drive up traffic is to generate controversy, but it really doesn&#039;t seem right that a very good publication has to have their name dragged through the mud so that someone else can try and get publicity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will continue to read and trust Wine Spectator as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Thomas,</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to comment&#8230;and you&#39;re welcome. Everyone wants to take down the big guy, and if Wine Spectator isn&#39;t the biggest guy on the block, it is certainly close. One of the best ways for a blog to get noticed and drive up traffic is to generate controversy, but it really doesn&#39;t seem right that a very good publication has to have their name dragged through the mud so that someone else can try and get publicity.</p>
<p>I will continue to read and trust Wine Spectator as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpower</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherwineblog.com/archives/390/comment-page-1#comment-2054</link>
		<dc:creator>jpower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherwineblog.com/?p=390#comment-2054</guid>
		<description>Hi Thomas,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to comment...and you&#039;re welcome. Everyone wants to take down the big guy, and if Wine Spectator isn&#039;t the biggest guy on the block, it is certainly close. One of the best ways for a blog to get noticed and drive up traffic is to generate controversy, but it really doesn&#039;t seem right that a very good publication has to have their name dragged through the mud so that someone else can try and get publicity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will continue to read and trust Wine Spectator as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Thomas,</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to comment&#8230;and you&#39;re welcome. Everyone wants to take down the big guy, and if Wine Spectator isn&#39;t the biggest guy on the block, it is certainly close. One of the best ways for a blog to get noticed and drive up traffic is to generate controversy, but it really doesn&#39;t seem right that a very good publication has to have their name dragged through the mud so that someone else can try and get publicity.</p>
<p>I will continue to read and trust Wine Spectator as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpower</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherwineblog.com/archives/390/comment-page-1#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>jpower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherwineblog.com/?p=390#comment-866</guid>
		<description>Hi Thomas,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to comment...and you&#039;re welcome. Everyone wants to take down the big guy, and if Wine Spectator isn&#039;t the biggest guy on the block, it is certainly close. One of the best ways for a blog to get noticed and drive up traffic is to generate controversy, but it really doesn&#039;t seem right that a very good publication has to have their name dragged through the mud so that someone else can try and get publicity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will continue to read and trust Wine Spectator as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Thomas,</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to comment&#8230;and you&#39;re welcome. Everyone wants to take down the big guy, and if Wine Spectator isn&#39;t the biggest guy on the block, it is certainly close. One of the best ways for a blog to get noticed and drive up traffic is to generate controversy, but it really doesn&#39;t seem right that a very good publication has to have their name dragged through the mud so that someone else can try and get publicity.</p>
<p>I will continue to read and trust Wine Spectator as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
