Because another wine food and travel blog was way too long.
|
|
Objectivity vs. SubjectivityOver at Vinography, there is a fantastic discussion about the places of objectivity and subjectivity in wine critiques. There are a lot of great points made in both the article and the comments. Writing like this combined with the great reader comments is what makes Vinography one of the best wine blogs around.
For what it is worth, I agree with Alder. Without the subjective opinions of critics there really is no criticism. The trick is to find critics that are both knowledgeable and whose opinions run along the same lines as yours. Not a good way to pick your news sources, but imperative with critiques. With wine, I know that Andrea Robinson thinks that Riesling is the greatest white grape there is, and while a lot of wine people look down on it, I agree with Ms. Robinson. I also know that Robert Parker loves clean, big, very high alcohol wines, and while I do too sometimes, I also love old-style “funky” Old World wines, so I take his reviews of those for what they are. As a story I posted a while back shows, despite the subjectivity of the biggest wine critics out there, they still manage to be very consistent when compared to one another. If they only stuck to quantifiable facts, what would be the point of having more than one of them, much less the thousands of dorks like me babbling about wine all over these Interwebs?
Page 1 of 0
|








